Apply For FDI


Fraud Warning Disclaimer : FDI India warns you against certain individuals that might falsely present themselves as our affiliate agents, representatives, or employees. Under this false pretence, they might try to gain access to your personal information or to acquire money as Consultation fee or any other form or other valuables from you by offering fictitious employment opportunities or by claiming that they are contacting you on our behalf. Don’t fall prey into the fraudulent misrepresentation. Such fraudulent claims and offers are received generally via email, text message, phone, or internet, etc.

FDI India would like to bring to your notice that our authorized official Email ID is, . FDI India shall not be liable for any claims, damage, or loss of any kind inflicted by any other unauthorized entity. Be very mindful of such scams.
Legal : We own all the information, images, text, logo, and other content provided by us. The use of information is strictly prohibited without our consent. We hold the right to take a legal action against any individual or organization violating or using our site information.
Become A Partner Apply For FDI
Fdi India news

Reduce Import Tariffs to Increase Industry Competitiveness: Electronics Industry

    9 January , 2022         Fdiindia

Reduce Import Tariffs to Increase Industry Competitiveness: Electronics Industry

The India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) and IKHDHVAJ Advisers LLP have published a report asking for a cut in import tariffs for the electronics sector. The report mentioned that high import tariffs hurt the Indian electronics sector and made the country less competitive in the global marketplace.

The report also mentioned that import tariffs were nullifying the effect of industry-friendly schemes such as the production-linked incentives (PLI) scheme.

It further added that an underlying reason for increasing the tariff is that India’s large market size, coupled with higher tariffs, would attract more foreign direct investment (FDI).

“This presumption may not be true for the electronics sector as a whole. India’s domestic market is not very large compared to the global market. Moreover, the comparison with competing economies suggests that the size of the domestic market does not necessarily result in higher exports or deeper links with global value chains (GVCs). This implies a need to carefully consider the possible adverse impact of raising tariffs on exports and even investment,” the report said.

The report was compiled after comparing India’s tariffs with those of China, Vietnam, Thailand, and Mexico. It consists of a detailed study of 120 tariff lines of priority products for the electronics industry and the previously mentioned four nations.

The imports make up 80% of the cost of mobile phones – the largest contributor to India’s $75 billion electronics sector.

The report further highlighted that India’s competing economies utilize a combination of trade and investment policies for economic growth.

They focused on enhancing the domestic capabilities to become significant participants in global value chains, and attracting foreign investments using subsidies and an investor-friendly business environment.

“However, among the policies followed by India and its competing economies, there is one major difference. India has higher tariffs and it relies much more on increasing tariffs compared to its competing economies. India’s policies are thus driven by the domestic market rather than opportunities in global markets,” the report added.

“A $300 billion manufacturing target by 2026 requires stability and prior consultation before finalizing tariffs. Tariffs go to the core of competitiveness and scale. For Union Budget 2022-23, we request the government to review all tariffs on inputs for PLI schemes and reduce tariffs in areas where there is no local capacity,” said Pankaj Mohindroo, Chairman, ICEA.



India Likely to Outperform Japan to Become Asia’s 2nd Largest Economy by 2030: IHS

DPIIT to Facilitate LIC Disinvestment with Amended FDI Policy: Secretary